Jannik Sinner vs Casper Ruud Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 May at 10:43 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Sinner vs C. Ruud

ITA
4
Win
Played
0
Win

NOR
4
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sinner 4 - 0 Ruud
They have played 8 sets in total, with Jannik Sinner winning 8 and Casper Ruud winning 0. The last match between Jannik Sinner and Casper Ruud was at the Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome, 15-05-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Jannik Sinner getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sinner | 4 |
| Ruud | 0 |
Last 4 H2H Matches:
(QF) Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome(05-15-25)
(SF) Nitto ATP Finals - Turin(11-16-24)
(QF) Erste Bank Open - Vienna(10-29-21)
J. Sinner vs C. Ruud H2H Profile
J. Sinner vs C. Ruud Match Preview:
- Second serve effectiveness shows Ruud leading slightly with 46.8% compared to Sinner's 42.66% in the past half-year. Does a marginal edge predict a win? Often, it does.
- Sinner returns well, taking 39.07% of opponents' second serve points, but Ruud does better with 44.66%. It hints at Ruud's potential to counter Sinner's serve.
- First serve return stats mirror the above; Ruud again edges out with 25.46% over Sinner's 22.48%. Ruud's return game is slightly more formidable.
- Do breakpoints reveal Sinner's Achilles' heel? Not really. Ruud saves 60% of breakpoints versus Sinner's 55.47%, providing a psychological advantage.
- In pure match wins, Sinner shines with a remarkable 93.22% win rate over the past year, overshadowing Ruud's 66.67%. Victory may depend on maintaining this form.
- Surface preference contrasts as Sinner thrives on indoor hard courts (80% win rate), while Ruud excels on clay (70% win rate). Their preferred game surfaces could be pivotal.
- Sinner competes primarily at the Grand Slam level, whereas Ruud plays mostly on the Main tour, indicating Sinner's experience at higher stakes.
- Historically, Sinner dominates their head-to-head matchups, winning all three. Are past victories a precursor to today's result? Often, they are.
- Opponents' ranking superiority favors Sinner; he faces tougher competition, with his average opponent ranking 42.64, against Ruud's 61.86.
- Ruud is marginally more efficient in breakpoint conversion at 26.62% compared to Sinner’s 24.49%, which might indicate better seizing of break opportunities.
- Ruud has a slight edge in deciding set performance, with a 75% win rate compared to Sinner's 67%.
Editorial Prediction (May 14, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Jannik Sinner and Casper Ruud presents intriguing statistics and form trends. While Sinner showcases extraordinary winning consistency over the past year, Ruud's recent edge in return games and breakpoint resiliency suggests a fascinating contest.
Sinner’s historical dominance in direct encounters, coupled with his high stakes experience and superior opposition faced, enhances his outlook. Ruud’s slight statistical advantage in specific metrics might not suffice against Sinner’s more comprehensive winning track record.
Given these facts, Jannik Sinner appears likely to continue his winning streak against Casper Ruud.
Jannik Sinner vs Casper Ruud Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Sinner vs C. Ruud H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 8 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 50 | Games Won | 19 |
| 26 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:24:3 | Average Match Time | 1:24:3 |
| 62% (133/214) | 1st Serve % | 55% (122/222) |
| 77% (103/133) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (76/122) |
| 58% (47/81) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (33/100) |
| 49% (17/35) | Break Pts Won % | 22% (2/9) |
| 51% (113/222) | Return Points Win % | 30% (64/214) |
| 100% (4/4) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/4) |
| 100% (4/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/4) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Sinner Recent Matches Played
C. Ruud Recent Matches Played

J. Sinner vs C. Ruud Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.56% (402/130) | YTD Win/Loss | 65.02% (448/241) |
| 70.37% (962/405) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.23% (1047/663) |
| 56.83% (7402/5623) | Games Win/Loss | 54.23% (8899/7512) |
| 77.51% (162/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.20% (118/78) |
| 68.53% (98/45) | Clay Win/Loss | 69.72% (251/109) |
| 81.02% (111/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.67% (74/46) |
| 72.09% (31/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 38.46% (5/8) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
| 2807 | Aces Total | 2992 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1073 | Total Double Faults | 1482 |
| 1:49:39 | Average Match Time | 1:40:36 |
| 257.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 327.61 |
| 59% (22718/38261) | 1st Serve % | 65% (31257/48074) |
| 75% (16941/22718) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (22335/31257) |
| 55% (8479/15543) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (8997/16817) |
| 43% (1775/4118) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1853/4486) |
| 41% (16571/40418) | Return Points Win % | 38% (18230/47990) |
| 81.08% (90/21) | Slam W/L | 65.96% (62/32) |
| 75.81% (94/30) | Masters W/L | 60.29% (82/54) |
| 93.75% (15/1) | Cups W/L | 77.14% (27/8) |
| 76.16% (115/36) | Main Tour W/L | 67.12% (147/72) |
| 84.62% (11/2) | Tour Finals W/L | 53.85% (7/6) |
| 66.67% (30/15) | Challenger W/L | 57.69% (60/44) |
| 65.28% (47/25) | Futures W/L | 71.43% (60/24) |
| 75% (308/412) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (391/594) |
| 80% (91/114) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 61% (54/88) |
| 63% (125/197) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (129/250) |
| 63% (94/150) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (123/204) |
| 90% (386/346) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (427/384) |
| 10% (386/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (427/43) |
| 38% (146/55) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (262/65) |